Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050858›Full record

Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Multi-centre, prospective randomized comparison of three different substrate ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Kaige Li, Changhao Xu, Xiyao Zhu, Xinhua Wang, Ping Ye, Weifeng Jiang, Shaohui Wu, Kai Xu, Xiangting Li, Ying Wang and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Repeat in situ ablation vs. extensive ablation for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Individualized dynamic ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation based on ibutilide response.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Re-recognized the maintenance mechanism of persistent atrial fibrillation via electrogram analysis in termination regions.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: glimpsing the light ahead?Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Aggressive ablation vs. regular ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre real-world cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A multicenter, cohort study of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation with/without atrial fibrillation termination (the termination-atrial fibrillation study).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kaige LiDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0009-0001-1607-8975
Changhao XuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6129-946X
Xiyao ZhuDepartment of Clinical Integration of Traditional Chinese and Western medicine, First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2765-6539
Xinhua WangDepartment of Cardiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8231-1253
Ping YeDepartment of Cardiology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Weifeng JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.
Shaohui WuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.
Kai XuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.
Xiangting LiDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2839-5780
Ying WangDepartment of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-682X
Qidong ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, Yuhuan Second People's Hospital, Yuhuan, China.
Yanzhe WangDepartment of Cardiology, Changshu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changshu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-4578
Lihua LengDepartment of Cardiology, The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital, Anqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-4014
Zengtang ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Jinan City People's Hospital, Jinan, China.
Bing HanDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-0573
Yu ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-0252
Mu QinDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.
Xu LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No.241 West Huaihai Road, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9703-5258

Funding

National Key Research and Development 2018YFC1312503National Natural Science Foundation of China No: 81770324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe optimal strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is poorly defined. We conducted a multicentre, randomized, prospective trial to compare the outcomes of different ablation strategies for PerAF. METHODS AND

resultsWe enrolled 450 patients and randomly assigned them in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo pulmonary vein isolation and subsequently undergo the following three different ablation strategies: anatomical guided ablation (ANAT group, n = 150), electrogram guided ablation (EGM group, n = 150), and extensive electro-anatomical guided ablation (EXT group, n = 150). The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting longer than 30 s at 12 months after a single ablation procedure. After 12 months of follow-up, 72% (108) of patients in the EXT group were free from AF recurrence, as compared with the 64% (96) in the EGM group (P = 0.116), and 54% (81) in the ANAT group (P = 0.002). The EXT group showed less AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence than the EGM group (60% vs. 50%, P = 0.064) and the ANAT group (60% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.001). The EXT group showed the highest rate of AF termination (66.7%), followed by 56.7% in the EGM group, and 20.7% in the ANAT group. The AF termination signified less AF recurrence at 12 months compared to patients without AF termination (30.1% vs. 42.7%, P = 0.008). Safety endpoints did not differ significantly between the three groups (P = 0.924).

conclusionsElectro-anatomical guided ablation achieved the most favourable outcomes among the three ablation strategies. The AF termination is a reliable ablation endpoint.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPulmonary VeinsElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacHumansProspective StudiesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationSubstrate

Identifiers

PMID37050858
PMCPMC10228617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.