Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050807›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Graph Visualization: Alternative Models Inspired by Bioinformatics.

Maxim Kolomeets, Vasily Desnitsky, Igor Kotenko, Andrey Chechulin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxim KolomeetsSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-2733
Vasily DesnitskySt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3748-5414
Igor KotenkoSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6859-7120
Andrey ChechulinSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7056-6972

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 18-71-10094-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the methods and means of human-machine interaction and visualization as its integral part are being increasingly developed. In various fields of scientific knowledge and technology, there is a need to find and select the most effective visualization models for various types of data, as well as to develop automation tools for the process of choosing the best visualization model for a specific case. There are many data visualization tools in various application fields, but at the same time, the main difficulty lies in presenting data of an interconnected (node-link) structure, i.e., networks. Typically, a lot of software means use graphs as the most straightforward and versatile models. To facilitate visual analysis, researchers are developing ways to arrange graph elements to make comparing, searching, and navigating data easier. However, in addition to graphs, there are many other visualization models that are less versatile but have the potential to expand the capabilities of the analyst and provide alternative solutions. In this work, we collected a variety of visualization models, which we call alternative models, to demonstrate how different concepts of information representation can be realized. We believe that adapting these models to improve the means of human-machine interaction will help analysts make significant progress in solving the problems researchers face when working with graphs.

Indexed as

data visualizationhuman–computer interactionnode-link diagramsreviewvisualization models

Identifiers

PMID37050807
PMCPMC10099065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.