ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Performance Assessment of Heartbeat Detection Algorithms on Photoplethysmograph and Functional NearInfrared Spectroscopy Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Physiological Signals from Photoplethysmography Sensors Compared to an Electrocardiogram Sensor: A Validation Study in Daily Life.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in Wearable Photoplethysmography Applications in Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With wearable sensors, the acquisition of physiological signals has become affordable and feasible in everyday life. Specifically, Photoplethysmography (PPG), being a low-cost and highly portable technology, has attracted notable interest for measuring and diagnosing cardiac activity, one of the most important physiological and autonomic indicators. In addition to the technological development, several specific signal-processing algorithms have been designed to enable reliable detection of heartbeats and cope with the lower quality of the signals. In this study, we compare three heartbeat detection algorithms: Derivative-Based Detection (DBD), Recursive Combinatorial Optimization (RCO), and Multi-Scale Peak and Trough Detection (MSPTD). In particular, we considered signals from two datasets, namely, the PPG-DALIA dataset (N = 15) and the FANTASIA dataset (N = 20) which differ in terms of signal characteristics (sampling frequency and length) and type of acquisition devices (wearable and medical-grade). The comparison is performed both in terms of heartbeat detection performance and computational workload required to execute the algorithms. Finally, we explore the applicability of these algorithms on the cardiac component obtained from functional Near InfraRed Spectroscopy signals (fNIRS).The results indicate that, while the MSPTD algorithm achieves a higher F1 score in cases that involve body movements, such as cycling (MSPTD: Mean = 74.7, SD = 14.4; DBD: Mean = 54.4, SD = 21.0; DBD + RCO: Mean = 49.5, SD = 22.9) and walking up and down the stairs (MSPTD: Mean = 62.9, SD = 12.2; DBD: Mean = 50.5, SD = 11.9; DBD + RCO: Mean = 45.0, SD = 14.0), for all other activities the three algorithms perform similarly. In terms of computational complexity, the computation time of the MSPTD algorithm appears to grow exponentially with the signal sampling frequency, thus requiring longer computation times in the case of high-sampling frequency signals, where the usage of the DBD and RCO algorithms might be preferable. All three algorithms appear to be appropriate candidates for exploring the applicability of heartbeat detection on fNIRS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.