Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050630›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Model for Cognitive Personalization of Microtask Design.

Dennis Paulino, Diogo Guimarães, António Correia, José Ribeiro, João Barroso, Hugo Paredes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dennis PaulinoSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-6302
Diogo GuimarãesSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
António CorreiaSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-3835
José RibeiroSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
João BarrosoSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-5104
Hugo ParedesSchool of Science and Technology, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-4783

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/148991/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of data quality in crowdsourcing campaigns is currently a prominent research topic, given the diverse range of participants involved. A potential solution to enhancing data quality processes in crowdsourcing is cognitive personalization, which involves appropriately adapting or assigning tasks based on a crowd worker's cognitive profile. There are two common methods for assessing a crowd worker's cognitive profile: administering online cognitive tests, and inferring behavior from task fingerprinting based on user interaction log events. This article presents the findings of a study that investigated the complementarity of both approaches in a microtask scenario, focusing on personalizing task design. The study involved 134 unique crowd workers recruited from a crowdsourcing marketplace. The main objective was to examine how the administration of cognitive ability tests can be used to allocate crowd workers to microtasks with varying levels of difficulty, including the development of a deep learning model. Another goal was to investigate if task fingerprinting can be used to allocate crowd workers to different microtasks in a personalized manner. The results indicated that both objectives were accomplished, validating the usage of cognitive tests and task fingerprinting as effective mechanisms for microtask personalization, including the development of a deep learning model with 95% accuracy in predicting the accuracy of the microtasks. While we achieved an accuracy of 95%, it is important to note that the small dataset size may have limited the model's performance.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingCognitionData AccuracyHumanscognitive abilitiescrowdsourcinghuman-computer interactionmicrotask designpersonalizationtask fingerprinting

Identifiers

PMID37050630
PMCPMC10098703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.