Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050625›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Method for Stress Detection Using Empatica E4 Bracelet and Machine-Learning Techniques.

Sara Campanella, Ayham Altaleb, Alberto Belli, Paola Pierleoni, Lorenzo Palma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara CampanellaDepartment of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-1796
Ayham AltalebDepartment of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-5612-4738
Alberto BelliDepartment of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6142-0987
Paola PierleoniDepartment of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-8864
Lorenzo PalmaDepartment of Information Engineering (DII), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-3310
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to challenging circumstances, the human body can experience marked levels of anxiety and distress. To prevent stress-related complications, timely identification of stress symptoms is crucial, necessitating the need for continuous stress monitoring. Wearable devices offer a means of real-time and ongoing data collection, facilitating personalized stress monitoring. Based on our protocol for data pre-processing, this study proposes to analyze signals obtained from the Empatica E4 bracelet using machine-learning algorithms (Random Forest, SVM, and Logistic Regression) to determine the efficacy of the abovementioned techniques in differentiating between stressful and non-stressful situations. Photoplethysmographic and electrodermal activity signals were collected from 29 subjects to extract 27 features which were then fed into three different machine-learning algorithms for binary classification. Using MATLAB after applying the chi-square test and Pearson's correlation coefficient on WEKA for features' importance ranking, the results demonstrated that the Random Forest model has the highest stability (accuracy of 76.5%) using all the features. Moreover, the Random Forest applying the chi-test for feature selection reached consistent results in terms of stress evaluation based on precision, recall, and F1-measure (71%, 60%, 65%, respectively).

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsData CollectionHumansMachine LearningRandom Forestchi-square testEmpatica E4IoTmachine learningobjective stress measurementwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID37050625
PMCPMC10098696
OpenAlexW4361290388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.