ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Phishing URLs Detection Using Sequential and Parallel ML Techniques: Comparative Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adversarial-resilient lightweight phishing url detection: Evaluating lexical & metadata features under evasion techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- PhishNet 1.0: optuna-optimized stacking ensemble with Boruta-based feature selection for phishing URL detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Android Ransomware Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning Techniques Based on Traffic Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In today's digitalized era, the world wide web services are a vital aspect of each individual's daily life and are accessible to the users via uniform resource locators (URLs). Cybercriminals constantly adapt to new security technologies and use URLs to exploit vulnerabilities for illicit benefits such as stealing users' personal and sensitive data, which can lead to financial loss, discredit, ransomware, or the spread of malicious infections and catastrophic cyber-attacks such as phishing attacks. Phishing attacks are being recognized as the leading source of data breaches and the most prevalent deceitful scam of cyber-attacks. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have proven to be infallible in detecting phishing attacks. Nevertheless, sequential ML can be time intensive and not highly efficient in real-time detection. It can also be incapable of handling vast amounts of data. However, utilizing parallel computing techniques in ML can help build precise, robust, and effective models for detecting phishing attacks with less computation time. Therefore, in this proposed study, we utilized various multiprocessing and multithreading techniques in Python to train ML and DL models. The dataset used comprised 54 K records for training and 12 K for testing. Five experiments were carried out, the first one based on sequential execution followed by the next four based on parallel execution techniques (threading using Python parallel backend, threading using Python parallel backend and number of jobs, threading manually, and multiprocessing using Python parallel backend). Four models, namely, random forest (RF), naïve bayes (NB), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) were deployed to carry out the experiments. Overall, the experiments yielded excellent results and speedup. Lastly, to consolidate, a comprehensive comparative analysis was performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.