ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Sensing Mechanisms of Rough Plasmonic Surfaces for Protein Binding of Surface Plasmon Resonance Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Natural Bioactive Peptide fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) has been utilized in various optical applications, including biosensors. The SPR-based sensor is a gold standard for protein kinetic measurement due to its ultrasensitivity on the plasmonic metal surface. However, a slight change in the surface morphology, such as roughness or pattern, can significantly impact its performance. This study proposes a theoretical framework to explain sensing mechanisms and quantify sensing performance parameters of angular surface plasmon resonance detection for binding kinetic sensing at different levels of surface roughness. The theoretical investigation utilized two models, a protein layer coating on a rough plasmonic surface with and without sidewall coatings. The two models enable us to separate and quantify the enhancement factors due to the localized surface plasmon polaritons at sharp edges of the rough surfaces and the increased surface area for protein binding due to roughness. The Gaussian random surface technique was employed to create rough metal surfaces. Reflectance spectra and quantitative performance parameters were simulated and quantified using rigorous coupled-wave analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. These parameters include sensitivity, plasmonic dip position, intensity contrast, full width at half maximum, plasmonic angle, and figure of merit. Roughness can significantly impact the intensity measurement of binding kinetics, positively or negatively, depending on the roughness levels. Due to the increased scattering loss, a tradeoff between sensitivity and increased roughness leads to a widened plasmonic reflectance dip. Some roughness profiles can give a negative and enhanced sensitivity without broadening the SPR spectra. We also discuss how the improved sensitivity of rough surfaces is predominantly due to the localized surface wave, not the increased density of the binding domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.