Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050426›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Wire Rope Defect Recognition Method Based on MFL Signal Analysis and 1D-CNNs.

Shiwei Liu, Muchao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiwei LiuCollege of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5389-1930
Muchao ChenNetwork Information and Modern Education Technology Center, Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, Guangzhou 510650, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M662600Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2662022GXQD002National Natural Science Foundation of China 52005203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative defect detection of wire rope is crucial to guarantee safety in various application scenes, and sophisticated inspection conditions usually lead to the accurate testing of difficulties and challenges. Thus, a magnetic flux leakage (MFL) signal analysis and convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-based wire rope defect recognition method was proposed to solve this challenge. Typical wire rope defect inspection data obtained from one-dimensional (1D) MFL testing were first analyzed both in time and frequency domains. After the signal denoising through a new combination of Haar wavelet transform and differentiated operation and signal preprocessing by normalization, ten main features were used in the datasets, and then the principles of the proposed MFL and 1D-CNNs-based wire rope defect classifications were presented. Finally, the performance of the novel method was evaluated and compared with six machine learning methods and related algorithms, which demonstrated that the proposed method featured the highest testing accuracy (>98%) and was valid and feasible for the quantitative and accurate detection of broken wire defects. Additionally, the considerable application potential as well as the limitations of the proposed methods, and future work, were discussed.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)defect detectionfeature extractionsignal analysiswire rope

Identifiers

PMID37050426
PMCPMC10098571
OpenAlexW4360618739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.