Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050300›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Enhanced Adhesion of Electrospun Polycaprolactone Nanofibers to Plasma-Modified Polypropylene Fabric.

Lucie Janů, Eva Dvořáková, Kateřina Polášková, Martina Buchtelová, Petr Ryšánek, Zdeněk Chlup, Tomáš Kruml, Oleksandr Galmiz, David Nečas, Lenka Zajíčková

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie JanůPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6298-2228
Eva DvořákováPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-221X
Kateřina PoláškováPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2687-9274
Martina BuchtelováPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-0241
Petr RyšánekFaculty of Science, J.E. Purkyně University, Pasteurova 15, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9209-3202
Zdeněk ChlupInstitute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Žižkova 22, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-240X
Tomáš KrumlInstitute of Physics of Materials, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Žižkova 22, 616 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8855-1709
Oleksandr GalmizDepartment of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-180X
David NečasPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7731-8453
Lenka ZajíčkováPlasma Technologies for Materials, Central European Institute of Technology-CEITEC, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-8906
Central European Institute of Technology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physics of Materials · CZJan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem · CZMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 20-14105SMEYS CR LM2018110MEYS CR LM2018124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excellent adhesion of electrospun nanofiber (NF) to textile support is crucial for a broad range of their bioapplications, e.g., wound dressing development. We compared the effect of several low- and atmospheric pressure plasma modifications on the adhesion between two parts of composite-polycaprolactone (PCL) nanofibrous mat (functional part) and polypropylene (PP) spunbond fabric (support). The support fabrics were modified before electrospinning by low-pressure plasma oxygen treatment or amine plasma polymer thin film or treated by atmospheric pressure plasma slit jet (PSJ) in argon or argon/nitrogen. The adhesion was evaluated by tensile test and loop test adapted for thin NF mat measurement and the trends obtained by both tests largely agreed. Although all modifications improved the adhesion significantly (at least twice for PSJ treatments), low-pressure oxygen treatment showed to be the most effective as it strengthened adhesion by a factor of six. The adhesion improvement was ascribed to the synergic effect of high treatment homogeneity with the right ratio of surface functional groups and sufficient wettability. The low-pressure modified fabric also stayed long-term hydrophilic (ten months), even though surfaces usually return to a non-wettable state (hydrophobic recovery). In contrast to XPS, highly surface-sensitive water contact angle measurement proved suitable for monitoring subtle surface changes.

Indexed as

adhesionatmospheric pressure plasma jetcompositeelectrospinningloop testlow-pressure plasma modificationPCL nanofibersPP fabrictensile test

Identifiers

PMID37050300
PMCPMC10097108
OpenAlexW4361290812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.