Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37050054›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

LSPpred Suite: Tools for Leaderless Secretory Protein Prediction in Plants.

Andrew Lonsdale, Laura Ceballos-Laita, Daisuke Takahashi, Matsuo Uemura, Javier Abadía, Melissa J Davis, Antony Bacic, Monika S Doblin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew LonsdaleARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Laura Ceballos-LaitaPlant Stress Physiology Group, Plant Nutrition Department, Aula Dei Experimental Station, CSIC, P.O. Box 13034, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-1719
Daisuke TakahashiUnited Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Iwate University, Morioka 020-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9503-614X
Matsuo UemuraFaculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Morioka 020-8550, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-2976
Javier AbadíaPlant Stress Physiology Group, Plant Nutrition Department, Aula Dei Experimental Station, CSIC, P.O. Box 13034, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-5901
Melissa J DavisBioinformatics, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute for Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Antony BacicARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Monika S DoblinARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8921-2725
The University of Melbourne · AUEstación Experimental de Aula Dei · ESIwate University · JPWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls CE110100410Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2020-115856RB-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant proteins that are secreted without a classical signal peptide leader sequence are termed leaderless secretory proteins (LSPs) and are implicated in both plant development and (a)biotic stress responses. In plant proteomics experimental workflows, identification of LSPs is hindered by the possibility of contamination from other subcellar compartments upon purification of the secretome. Applying machine learning algorithms to predict LSPs in plants is also challenging due to the rarity of experimentally validated examples for training purposes. This work attempts to address this issue by establishing criteria for identifying potential plant LSPs based on experimental observations and training random forest classifiers on the putative datasets. The resultant plant protein database LSPDB and bioinformatic prediction tools LSPpred and SPLpred are available at lsppred.lspdb.org. The LSPpred and SPLpred modules are internally validated on the training dataset, with false positives controlled at 5%, and are also able to classify the limited number of established plant LSPs (SPLpred (3/4, LSPpred 4/4). Until such time as a larger set of bona fide (independently experimentally validated) LSPs is established using imaging technologies (light/fluorescence/electron microscopy) to confirm sub-cellular location, these tools represent a bridging method for predicting and identifying plant putative LSPs for subsequent experimental validation.

Indexed as

leaderless secretory proteinssubcellular localisation predictionunconventional protein secretion

Identifiers

PMID37050054
PMCPMC10097205
OpenAlexW4360614129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.