Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37049729›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Developments in Plant Proteins Production for Meat and Fish Analogues.

Malgorzata Nowacka, Magdalena Trusinska, Paulina Chraniuk, Federico Drudi, Jakub Lukasiewicz, Nam Phuong Nguyen, Adrianna Przybyszewska, Katarzyna Pobiega, Silvia Tappi, Urszula Tylewicz and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Engineering Processes for Plant-Based Meat Analogs: Current Status and Future Outlook.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Exploring Sustainable Future Protein Sources.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  9. Cutting-Edge Technologies of Meat Analogs: A Review.Food science of animal resources · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Malgorzata NowackaDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-6909
Magdalena TrusinskaDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-3812
Paulina ChraniukDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Federico DrudiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-3762
Jakub LukasiewiczDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Nam Phuong NguyenDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Adrianna PrzybyszewskaDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna PobiegaDepartment of Food Biotechnology and Microbiology, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-8666
Silvia TappiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0711-859X
Urszula TylewiczDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, 47521 Cesena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-6803
Katarzyna RybakDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3595-0818
Artur WiktorDepartment of Food Engineering and Process Management, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-6010

Funding

This study was supported by Ministry of Education and Science (Poland) from the state budget within a the program "Student research clubs create innovations" in the years 2022-2023 (grant number SKN/SP/534683/2022). SKN/SP/534683/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there have been significant developments in plant proteins production for meat and fish analogues. Some of the key developments include the use of new plant protein sources such as soy, legumes, grains, potatoes, and seaweed, as well as insect proteins, leaf proteins, mushrooms, and microbial proteins. Furthermore, to improve the technological and functional properties of plant proteins, they can be subjected to traditional and unconventional treatments such as chemical (glycosylation, deamidation, phosphorylation, and acylation), physical (pulsed electric fields, ultrasound, high hydrostatic pressure, dynamic high-pressure treatment, and cold plasma), and biological (fermentation and enzymatic modification). To obtain the high quality and the desired texture of the food product, other ingredients besides proteins, such as water, fat, flavors, binders, dyes, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, also have to be used. The final product can be significantly influenced by the matrix composition, variety of ingredients, and water content, with the type of ingredients playing a role in either enhancing or constraining the desired texture of the food. There are several types of technologies used for meat and fish analogues production, including extrusion, shear cell technology, spinning, 3D printing, and others. Overall, the technologies used for meat and fish analogues production are constantly evolving as new innovations are developed and existing methods are improved. These developments have led to the creation of plant-based products that have a similar texture, taste, and nutritional profile to meat and fish, making them more appealing to consumers seeking alternatives to animal-based products.

Indexed as

Meat ProductsPlant ProteinsAnimalsAntioxidantsFood HandlingMeatVegetablesAntioxidantsPlant Proteinsfish analogueshealth aspectsingredientsmeat analoguestechnology

Identifiers

PMID37049729
PMCPMC10095742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.