Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37049559›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

The Relationship between Maternal Ideation and Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice among Saudi Nursing Mothers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Wafaa T Elgzar, DaifAllah D Al-Thubaity, Mohammed A Alshahrani, Rasha M Essa, Heba A Ibrahim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07008625 (The Effect of Virtual Reality Application on Anxiety and Milk Quantity in Mothers Who Milk Their Babies by Milking), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07008625 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Virtual Reality Application on Anxiety and Milk Quantity in Mothers Who Milk Their Babies by Milking

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsHuman Milk, Breast MilkArmsvirtual reality glasses, routine care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The effect of virtual reality on the breastfeeding process: a randomized controlled study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wafaa T ElgzarDepartment of Maternity and Childhood Nursing, Nursing College, Najran University, Najran 66441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-3119
DaifAllah D Al-ThubaityDepartment of Maternity and Childhood Nursing, Nursing College, Najran University, Najran 66441, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlshahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Applied Medical Sciences College, Najran University, Najran 66441, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha M EssaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Nursing, Nursing College, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22514, Egypt.
Heba A IbrahimDepartment of Maternity and Childhood Nursing, Nursing College, Najran University, Najran 66441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6469-6313
Najran University · SADamanhour University · EG

Funding

Najran University NU/IFC/2/MRC/-/4the Deputy for Research and Innovation- Ministry of Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia NU/IFC/2/MRC/-/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All mortality risk factors are higher in non-breastfed infants compared to infants under five months of age who receive Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF). Examining the predicting role of maternal ideation in EBF practices can help to direct and strengthen the cooperation between multidisciplinary healthcare providers to formulate multidisciplinary breastfeeding enhancement strategies.

methodsThis correlational cross-sectional study investigates the relationship between maternal ideation and EBF practice among Saudi nursing mothers at Maternal and Children's Hospital (MCH) in Najran, Saudi Arabia. The study incorporated 403 Saudi nursing mothers aged 6-12 months with healthy infants. The data collected using a questionnaire comprises demographic characteristics and obstetric history, the EBF Practice scale, and a maternal ideation scale. The data was collected from the beginning of November 2022 to the end of January 2023 and analyzed using I.B.M. version 22.

resultsBreastfeeding initiation within one hour occurred among 85.1% of women, while 39.2% fed their newborn only colostrum during the first three days. EBF until six months was practiced by 40.9% of the participants day and night and on-demand (38.7%). Furthermore, 60.8% of the study participants had satisfactory overall EBF practices. The cognitive part of maternal ideation shows that 68.2% of the participants had adequate knowledge and 63.5% had positive beliefs regarding EBF practice. The maternal psychological ideation dimensions show that 81.4% had high EBF self-efficacy. The maternal social ideation dimensions showed that high injunctive and descriptive norms were present among 40.9% and 37.5%, respectively. In addition, healthcare providers (39.2%) had the most significant social influence, followed by husbands (30.5%). Binary logistic regression shows that the mother's age, occupation, and education are the significant demographic predictors of satisfactory EBF practices (

conclusionMaternal ideation constructs are positive predictors of satisfactory EBF practice and can be used to predict high-risk groups and plan for further intervention.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersChildCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancySaudi Arabiabeliefsexclusive breastfeedingknowledgematernal ideationSaudia Arabiaself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37049559
PMCPMC10097188
OpenAlexW4362470786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.