ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Unlocking the Power of Artificial Intelligence: Accurate Zeta Potential Prediction Using Machine Learning.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Predicting Critical Salt Concentration and pH in Sandstone Reservoirs.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nanomedicine: From Drug Formulation and Nanocarrier Design to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- Physicochemical and Antimicrobial Characterization of Nanobubbles Reveals Physical Disruption is the Primary Mode of Biofilm Inactivation.ACS ES&T water · 2026Article
- Factorial Design-Driven Optimization of Zein-Chitosan Nanoparticles for Oral Delivery of Silibinin.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Fabrication and Characterization of Xylomannan/FeInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2026Article
- Nanosponge-integrated hydrogel ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Review
- MakingInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- Article
- Modeling the Electrochemical Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology Platform for the Delivery of Docetaxel and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Article
- Influence of Composition on the Patterns of Electrokinetic Potential of Thermosensitive N-(Isopropyl)Acrylamide Derivatives with Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Dimethacrylate and N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)Acrylamide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Enhancing Aqueous Stability of Anionic Surfactants in High Salinity and Temperature Conditions with SiOACS omega · 2024Article
- Computational Designed and Optimized Liposomal Curcumin-Embedded Bifunctional Cross-Linked Hydrogels for Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoparticles have gained significance in modern science due to their unique characteristics and diverse applications in various fields. Zeta potential is critical in assessing the stability of nanofluids and colloidal systems but measuring it can be time-consuming and challenging. The current research proposes the use of cutting-edge machine learning techniques, including multiple regression analyses (MRAs), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANNs), to simulate the zeta potential of silica nanofluids and colloidal systems, while accounting for affecting parameters such as nanoparticle size, concentration, pH, temperature, brine salinity, monovalent ion type, and the presence of sand, limestone, or nano-sized fine particles. Zeta potential data from different literature sources were used to develop and train the models using machine learning techniques. Performance indicators were employed to evaluate the models' predictive capabilities. The correlation coefficient (r) for the ANN, SVM, and MRA models was found to be 0.982, 0.997, and 0.68, respectively. The mean absolute percentage error for the ANN model was 5%, whereas, for the MRA and SVM models, it was greater than 25%. ANN models were more accurate than SVM and MRA models at predicting zeta potential, and the trained ANN model achieved an accuracy of over 97% in zeta potential predictions. ANN models are more accurate and faster at predicting zeta potential than conventional methods. The model developed in this research is the first ever to predict the zeta potential of silica nanofluids, dispersed kaolinite, sand-brine system, and coal dispersions considering several influencing parameters. This approach eliminates the need for time-consuming experimentation and provides a highly accurate and rapid prediction method with broad applications across different fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.