Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048684›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?

Claudia A Salazar, Wuwei Feng, Leonardo Bonilha, Steven Kautz, Jens H Jensen, Mark S George, Nathan C Rowland

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia A SalazarDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Wuwei FengDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Leonardo BonilhaDepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Steven KautzDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-8235
Jens H JensenCenter for Biomedical Imaging, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-4287
Mark S GeorgeDepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1767-1815
Nathan C RowlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USDuke University · USEmory University · US

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Quantitative Behavioral Assessment & Rehabilitation Core (QBAR)P30GM154630 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MARK S GEORGE · 2024 to 2026
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM154630RRD VA IK6 RX003075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to which patients show improvements following tDCS is highly variable. This variability may be due to heterogeneity in regions of cortical infarct, descending motor tract injury, and/or connectivity changes, all factors that require neuroimaging for precise quantification and that affect the actual amount and location of current delivery. If the relationship between these factors and tDCS efficacy were clarified, recovery from stroke using tDCS might be become more predictable. This review provides a comprehensive summary and timeline of the development of tDCS for stroke from the viewpoint of neuroimaging. Both animal and human studies that have explored detailed aspects of anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics relevant to tDCS are discussed. Selected computational works are also included to demonstrate how sophisticated strategies for reducing variable effects of tDCS, including electric field modeling, are moving the field ever closer towards the goal of personalizing tDCS for each individual. Finally, larger and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials involving tDCS for chronic stroke recovery are underway that likely will shed light on how specific tDCS parameters, such as dose, affect stroke outcomes. The success of these collective efforts will determine whether tDCS for chronic stroke gains regulatory approval and becomes clinical practice in the future.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneuromodulationstroketranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37048684
PMCPMC10094806
OpenAlexW4361268864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.