Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048590›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Chondrosarcoma: A Clinical Review.

Aaron Gazendam, Snezana Popovic, Naveen Parasu, Michelle Ghert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Malignant and Benign Primary Bone Tumors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  14. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations as potential tumour agnostic targets.EJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron GazendamDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2615-4919
Snezana PopovicDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Naveen ParasuDepartment of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Michelle GhertDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4778-4522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrosarcomas are a diverse group of malignant cartilaginous matrix-producing neoplasms. Conventional chondrosarcomas are a continuum of disease based on the biologic activity of the tumor. The tumors range from the relatively biologically benign low-grade tumors or intermediate atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs), to malignant, aggressive high-grade tumors. The clinical presentation, radiographic and pathologic findings, treatments and outcomes vary significantly based on the histologic grade of the tumor. Chondrosarcomas present a diagnostic dilemma, particularly in the differentiation between high- and intermediate-grade tumors and that of low-grade tumors from benign enchondromas. A multidisciplinary team at a tertiary sarcoma centre allows for optimal care of these patients.

Indexed as

chondrosarcomareviewsarcoma

Identifiers

PMID37048590
PMCPMC10095313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.