Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048589›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Selecting Patients for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Pietro Gambitta, Paola Fontana, Ilaria Fanetti, Giulia Veglia, Maurizio Vertemati, Antonio Armellino, Paolo Aseni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pietro GambittaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, ASST-Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy.
Paola FontanaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, ASST-Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy.
Ilaria FanettiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, ASST-Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy.
Giulia VegliaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Civile di Legnano, ASST-Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy.
Maurizio VertematiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-1366
Antonio ArmellinoEndoscopy Division, Ospedale San Leopoldo Mandic di Merate, ASST Lecco, 23807 Lecco, Italy.
Paolo AseniDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-9305
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriali di Lecco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis determine the prognosis of gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. GI neoplasms limited to mucosa (m1 or m2) and superficial submucosa (sm1) can be treated effectively with minimally invasive endoscopic therapy, while the deep invasion of the submucosa (sm2 or sm3) is associated with lymph node metastasis, and surgical resection is required. Correct staging is therefore crucial for preoperative evaluation and planning. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can be used to detect the depth of invasion due to its close proximity to the lesion. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS, when compared to conventional endoscopic staging, is debated as it can under- or overstage the lesion. We aim in this study to determine if EUS can accurately differentiate mucosal from submucosal GI neoplasms to select patients with early GI lesions for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgery. From March 2014 to February 2022, 293 patients with early superficial GI neoplasms were admitted to our endoscopic unit for EUS staging. To evaluate the accuracy of EUS, we compared the preoperative EUS findings with the definitive histopathologic findings on the resected specimen. Overall, 242 of 293 lesions were correctly staged by EUS (82.59%). In the evaluation of submucosal invasion or deeper, EUS understaged 38 of 293 (12.96%) and overstaged 13 of 293 (4.43%) lesions. EUS has excellent accuracy in staging superficial GI neoplasms; its use is highly recommended before ESD since it can also detect lymph node metastases around the lesions, thus changing the indication from ESD to surgery.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasonographyESDgastrointestinal neoplasmsprognosisstagingsubepithelial lesion

Identifiers

PMID37048589
PMCPMC10094822
OpenAlexW4361007509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.