ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Repeated Measurements Are Necessary for Evaluating Accurate Diurnal Rhythm Using a Self-Intraocular Pressure Measurement Device.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate how many tests need to be performed to adequately assess intraocular pressure (IOP) diurnal change using a self-measuring rebound tonometer among glaucoma patients. SUBJECTS AND
methodsAdult patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included. IOP was measured in the morning (6 AM to 9 AM), afternoon (12 PM to 3 PM), and at night (6 PM to 9 PM) for seven consecutive days. Twenty-four (7 males and 17 females, mean age 59.5 ± 11.0 years) patients who successfully measured IOP at least three times per day during the correct time periods for four days were subjected to analysis.
resultsThe IOP rhythm was significantly greater on the first day of measurement (6.6 ± 3.6 mmHg) than that averaged during subsequent days (4.4 ± 2.2 mmHg). The time of the highest and lowest IOP measurements on the first day of IOP measurement and during the entire measurement period coincided in 72.9% and 64.6% of cases, respectively. The concordance rate of the highest IOP time between the whole measurement period and each measurement day was less than 60%.
conclusionThe diurnal IOP rhythm measured by the patients themselves was not consistent, and multiple days of measurements may be necessary to correctly assess diurnal IOP rhythm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.