Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048400›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Animal Protection in Filming in the Context of Spain.

Pablo De Damborenea Martín, Rubén Bermejo-Poza, Jesús De la Fuente Vázquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo De Damborenea MartínAnimal Production Department, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Avenida Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Bermejo-PozaAnimal Production Department, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Avenida Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-0750
Jesús De la Fuente VázquezAnimal Production Department, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Avenida Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7110-266X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals have fundamentally contributed to the development and growth of different cinematographic and audiovisual activities. As established in article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the basic text that establishes the objectives of the EU and from which the regulations or directives emanate, animal welfare is protected for the good of the general interest and therefore, must be taken into account when developing different European Union policies, especially those that may affect the internal market. This work aims to analyze each of the European regulations on animal protection and welfare to subsequently focus on each of the animal protection codes of the different countries of the union, trying to determine those premises related to the protection or the welfare of the animals that participate in these types of activities. We also wanted to make a brief comparison with countries such as the United Kingdom (UK) or the United States of America (USA), which are highly relevant to this topic. As a result of this analysis, the absence of standardized norms in the European Union has been revealed; however, in the UK and the USA, specific laws related to animal use in film media exist. Therefore, to develop new standards that guarantee the protection of animals in audiovisual productions in the EU are necessary, and these standards could also be expanded to other sectors or activities related to working animals.

Indexed as

animal protectionanimal welfareEuropean legislationfilmingSpanish regulations

Identifiers

PMID37048400
PMCPMC10093010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.