Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048396›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Implementation of a Canine Ergonomic Abdominal Simulator for Training Basic Laparoscopic Skills in Veterinarians.

Luis C Hincapié-Gutiérrez, Carlos A Oviedo-Peñata, Manuel A Rojas-Galvis, Carlos H Riaño-Benavides, Juan G Maldonado-Estrada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luis C Hincapié-GutiérrezOHVRI-Research Group, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Carlos A Oviedo-PeñataOHVRI-Research Group, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-0982
Manuel A Rojas-GalvisLatin American Center for Research and Training in Minimally Invasive Surgery Foundation, Bogotá 251008, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5488-4663
Carlos H Riaño-BenavidesOHVRI-Research Group, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Juan G Maldonado-EstradaOHVRI-Research Group, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, University of Antioquia, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0842-3705
Universidad de Antioquia · COFoundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research · COUniversity of Córdoba · CO

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencias y Tecnología de Colombia Colciencias 727-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validity of the CALMA Veterinary Lap-trainer simulator (CVLTS) for training basic veterinary laparoscopic skills was assessed and compared to a simple collapsible mobile box trainer. Ten veterinarian surgeons with no experience in laparoscopic surgery and four experts with at least two years of experience in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were included. The training curriculum included object transfer, non-woven gauze cutting with curved scissors, and interrupted and continuous intracorporeal sutures, which were practiced on the CVLTS. The initial and final assessments were carried out in both the CVLTS and in a collapsible mobile simulator. These were video-recorded and evaluated by external experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a specific scale evaluation in a double-blinded schedule. The time, angular displacement, number, and movement smoothness were recorded using a hands movement assessment system (HMAS). Through a survey, the face validity and content were evaluated. The data were analyzed by a Pearson's proportions comparison or Mann Whitney U test and a bilateral Student's

Indexed as

concurrent validityconstruct validitycontent validitylaparoscopic surgeryMISsimulationsurgery skillsveterinary surgery

Identifiers

PMID37048396
PMCPMC10093257
OpenAlexW4360860579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.