Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048390›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Drivers of Palatability for Cats and Dogs-What It Means for Pet Food Development.

Pavinee E Watson, David G Thomas, Emma N Bermingham, Nicola M Schreurs, Michael E Parker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gaps and Controversies in Feline Food Palatability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  3. Nutrient Digestibility, Chitin Recovery and Antioxidant Capacity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of dietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Graded Levels of Fermented Plant Protein (ProtegerAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pavinee E WatsonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.
David G ThomasSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-9351
Emma N BerminghamAdded Value Foods & Bio-Based Products, AgResearch Te Ohu Rangahau Kai, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0952-5260
Nicola M SchreursSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-9448
Michael E ParkerSchool of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pet food industry is an important sector of the pet care market that is growing rapidly. Whilst the number of new and innovative products continues to rise, research and development to assess product performance follows traditional palatability methodology. Pet food palatability research focuses on the amount of food consumed through use of one-bowl and two-bowl testing, but little understanding is given to why differences are observed, particularly at a fundamental ingredient level. This review will highlight the key differences in feeding behaviour and nutritional requirements between dogs and cats. The dominant pet food formats currently available and the ingredients commonly included in pet foods are also described. The current methods used for assessing pet food palatability and their limitations are outlined. The opportunities to utilise modern analytical methods to identify complete foods that are more palatable and understand the nutritional factors responsible for driving intake are discussed.

Indexed as

acceptancecatdogpalatabilitypet foodpreference

Identifiers

PMID37048390
PMCPMC10093350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.