ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Microbiological Risk Assessment in Foods: Background and Tools, with a Focus on Risk Ranger.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fungal Growth Risk Prediction and Optimal Regulation Method for Food Storage Based on the Forward Reachable Set.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment ofToxics · 2025Article
- Assessment of Food Hygiene Non-Compliance and Control Measures: A Three-Year Inspection Analysis in a Local Health Authority in Southern Italy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Climate change and campylobacteriosis from chicken meat: The changing risk factors and their importance.Food control · 2025Article
- Article
- Unveiling the flavor and quality variations in driedFood chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Complete genome of the Listeria monocytogenes strain AUF, used as a live listeriosis veterinary vaccine.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk assessment is an important phase of the food production path; it is strictly related to the processing chain as a necessary step for safe foods. This paper represents a contribution to understanding what is and how risk assessment could be conducted; it aims to provide some information on the structure of risk assessment, the tools for its identification and measurement and the importance of risk assessment for correct communication. In this context, after a focus on the background and on some commonly used tools (Risk Ranger, FDA-iRisk, decision tree, among others), the paper describes how to perform risk assessment through three case studies: lettuce (for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.