Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048248›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Performance of an Expert Sensory Panel and Instrumental Measures for Assessing Eating Fruit Quality Attributes in a Pear Breeding Programme.

Lidia Lozano, Ignasi Iglesias, Jaume Puy, Gemma Echeverria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lidia LozanoInstitute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Fruitcentre, Parc Agrobiotech, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0357-7855
Ignasi IglesiasInstitute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Fruitcentre, Parc Agrobiotech, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0082-8716
Jaume PuyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Gemma EcheverriaInstitute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Fruitcentre, Parc Agrobiotech, Parc de Gardeny, 25003 Lleida, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding programmes count on stable trained panels that support breeding evaluation selections. This work aimed to evaluate the performance of a small expert panel in the join IRTA-PFR breeding programme to validate its use in the sensory assessments of fruit pear genotypes during the selection process. A breeding F1 population of 80 pear seedlings from this programme was used. Descriptors and standard references used for sensory evaluations of pear attributes were previously defined by the four members of the expert panel. A General Procrustes Analysis (GPA) was applied to analyse the relations between instrumental and sensory traits. The results showed a good relationship between sensory attributes such as firmness and crispness with penetrometer measures. A high correlation was also found between sensory sourness and titratable acidity (TA). Panel performance was evaluated in terms of reproducibility, homogeneity, and panel consonance. The results indicated that the experts were very consistent and had a good performance. The work demonstrates, for the first time, that a small expert trained panel could be efficiently used in pear breeding programmes and allows for the selection process in a more economical and available way in contrast to the larger sensory panels conventionally used.

Indexed as

expert panelinstrumental measurementspear fruit qualitysensory descriptive analysis

Identifiers

PMID37048248
PMCPMC10093855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.