ArticleCells2023
A Deep-Learning-Computed Cancer Score for the Identification of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Area Based on a Six-Colour Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel.
Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI in Histopathology Explorer for comprehensive analysis of the evolving AI landscape in histopathology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Liver Histopathology Field: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed and fatal cancers worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most common primary liver cancer. Hundreds of studies involving thousands of patients have now been analysed across different cancer types, including HCC, regarding the effects of immune infiltrates on the prognosis of cancer patients. However, for these analyses, an unambiguous delineation of the cancer area is paramount, which is difficult due to the strong heterogeneity and considerable inter-operator variability induced by qualitative visual assessment and manual assignment. Nowadays, however, multiplex analyses allow the simultaneous evaluation of multiple protein markers, which, in conjunction with recent machine learning approaches, may offer great potential for the objective, enhanced identification of cancer areas with further in situ analysis of prognostic immune parameters. In this study, we, therefore, used an exemplary five-marker multiplex immunofluorescence panel of commonly studied markers for prognosis (CD3 T, CD4 T helper, CD8 cytotoxic T, FoxP3 regulatory T, and PD-L1) and DAPI to assess which analytical approach is best suited to combine morphological and immunohistochemical data into a cancer score to identify the cancer area that best matches an independent pathologist's assignment. For each cell, a total of 68 individual cell features were determined, which were used as input for 4 different approaches for computing a cancer score: a correlation-based selection of individual cell features, a MANOVA-based selection of features, a multilayer perceptron, and a convolutional neural network (a U-net). Accuracy was used to evaluate performance. With a mean accuracy of 75%, the U-net was best capable of identifying the cancer area. Although individual cell features showed a strong heterogeneity between patients, the spatial representations obtained with the computed cancer scores delineate HCC well from non-cancer liver tissues. Future analyses with larger sample sizes will help to improve the model and enable direct, in-depth investigations of prognostic parameters, ultimately enabling precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.