Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048042›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Role of Maternal Diet in the Risk of Childhood Acute Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jessica Blanco-Lopez, Isabel Iguacel, Silvia Pisanu, Claudia Choma Bettega Almeida, Eva Steliarova-Foucher, Ciska Sierens, Marc J Gunter, Elena J Ladas, Ronald D Barr, Koen Van Herck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Promoting Health for Adolescents: An Editorial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Jessica Blanco-LopezInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 69007 Lyon, France .ORCID 0000-0002-2122-7138
Isabel IguacelFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4242-5464
Silvia PisanuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Microbiology and Virology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7042-6275
Claudia Choma Bettega AlmeidaDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 1299, Brazil.
Eva Steliarova-FoucherInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 69007 Lyon, France .
Ciska SierensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Marc J GunterFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Elena J LadasDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Ronald D BarrDepartments of Pediatrics, Pathology and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-7440
Koen Van HerckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0717-2406
Inge HuybrechtsInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 69007 Lyon, France .ORCID 0000-0003-3838-855X
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRGhent University · BEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USImperial College London · GBMcMaster University · CAUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversity of Cagliari · IT

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the etiology of acute leukemia, one of the most common types of cancer in children; however, there is a lack of clarity regarding preventable risk factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of maternal dietary factors in the development of childhood leukemia. All epidemiological studies published until July 2022 that evaluated maternal dietary risk factors for childhood acute leukemia were identified in two electronic databases (PubMed and Web of Science) without limits of publication year or language. A total of 38 studies (1 prospective cohort study, 34 case-control studies and 3 studies with pooled analysis) were included. The published risk estimates were combined into a meta-analysis, using the Generic Inverse Variance method. The maternal consumption of fruits (two or more daily servings vs. less) was inversely associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (odds ratio = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.86), whereas maternal coffee intake (higher than two cups per day vs. no consumption) was associated with an increased risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (odds ratio = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12-1.89). Despite these findings, more high-quality research from cohort studies and the identification of causal factors are needed to develop evidence-based and cost-effective prevention strategies applicable at the population level. Review Registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128937.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcutePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaCase-Control StudiesChildDietHumansProspective StudiesRisk Factorsacute lymphoblastic leukemiaacute myeloid leukemiamaternal dietpreventionrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID37048042
PMCPMC10093835
OpenAlexW4362699264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.