Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37048003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Minna Sorsa, Hulda S Bryngeirsdottir, Eija Paavilainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minna SorsaChild Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Area of Pirkanmaa, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1988-0362
Hulda S BryngeirsdottirSchool of Health, Business and Natural Sciences, University of Akureyri, Solborg v/Nordurslod, 600 Akureyri, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-1925-9587
Eija PaavilainenHealth Sciences Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3081-5580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After suffering interpersonal violence (IPV), women survivors can access various interdisciplinary services and programmes to guide their recovery. Nevertheless, many vulnerable women postpone seeking help, sometimes indefinitely. Motherhood especially complicates help-seeking because mothers often want to protect both the perpetrator and their children. Understanding women's resilience, resources, and capacities in surviving IPV, however, could guide the development of helpful services that women actually access. Thus, in our study, we sought to explore the agency, resources, and reinforcing survival experiences of survivors of IPV. Our data, gathered in Finland during the COVID-19 pandemic, consisted of 12 narratives of mothers told in Clinical Ethnographic Narrative Interviews that were subsequently subjected to thematic analysis. Five themes describing personal resources, motherhood, and nature were identified under the overarching metaphor of "going forward like a grandmother in the snow". Recognising the agency, resources, capacities, and coping mechanisms of women who have suffered IPV can help in developing professional outreach programmes, promoting women's early access to useful resources, and, in turn, helping them to stop the possible intergenerational transmission of violence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intimate Partner ViolenceChildFemaleHumansMothersPandemicsgender-based violence (GBV)help-seekingintimate partner violence (IPV)maternal healthnaturequalitative researchsurvival strategiestraumatrauma recoverywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37048003
PMCPMC10094109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.