Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047956›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Community Organising Frameworks, Models, and Processes to Improve Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Shanti Kadariya, Lauren Ball, David Chua, Henriette Ryding, Julie Hobby, Julie Marsh, Karly Bartrim, Lana Mitchell, Joy Parkinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shanti KadariyaSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Lauren BallSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
David ChuaSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Henriette RydingSchool of SHS-Nutrition and Dietetics, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-5259
Julie HobbySchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Julie MarshSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Karly BartrimSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3528-4341
Lana MitchellSchool of SHS-Nutrition and Dietetics, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.
Joy ParkinsonSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community involvement engages, empowers, and mobilises people to achieve their shared goals by addressing structural inequalities in the social and built environment. Through this review, we summarised published information on models, frameworks, and/or processes of community organising used in the context of health initiatives or interventions and documented the outcomes following their use. A systematic scoping review was conducted in three databases with no restrictions on the date of publication, country, or written language. Out of 5044 studies, 38 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The targeted health outcomes explored by the studies were diverse and included sub-domains such as the promotion of a healthy lifestyle, sexual and reproductive health, access to healthcare and equity, and substance abuse and chronic disease management. The outcomes of most initiatives or interventions were promising, with positive changes reported for the target populations. A wide variation was noted in the models, frameworks, or processes of community organising utilised in these studies. We concluded that variation implies that no single model, framework, or process seems to have predominance over others in implementing community organising as a vehicle of positive social change within the health domain. The review also highlighted the need for a more standardised approach to the implementation and evaluation of these initiatives. We recommend that it is essential to foster public and non-governmental sector partnerships to promote community-driven health promotion efforts for a more sustainable approach to these initiatives.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDelivery of Health CareHealthy LifestyleHumanscommunity organisingframeworkshealthmodels

Identifiers

PMID37047956
PMCPMC10093850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.