Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047854›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Experiences of Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions for Common Mental Health Disorders in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Kate Bernard, Josephine M Wildman, Louise M Tanner, Akvile Stoniute, Madeleine Still, Rhiannon Green, Claire Eastaugh, Sarah Sowden, Katie H Thomson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'We're all doing different things' - exploring primary care practitioners' perspectives of managing distress: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kate BernardPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-046X
Josephine M WildmanPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9669-6708
Louise M TannerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-8677
Akvile StoniutePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8279-5123
Madeleine StillPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-6325
Rhiannon GreenNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-0675
Claire EastaughPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-6601
Sarah SowdenPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9359-3463
Katie H ThomsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9614-728X

Funding

Department of Health CA-CL-2018-04-ST2-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common mental health disorders (CMDs) disproportionately affect people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as 'social prescribing' and new models of care and clinical practice, are becoming increasingly prevalent in primary care. However, little is known about how these interventions work and their impact on socioeconomic inequalities in health. Focusing on people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage, this systematic review aims to: (1) explore the mechanisms by which non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions impact CMD-related health outcomes and inequalities; (2) identify the barriers to, and facilitators of, their implementation in primary care. This study is a systematic review of qualitative studies. Six bibliographic databases were searched (Medline, ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus) and additional grey literature sources were screened. The included studies were thematically analysed. Twenty-two studies were included, and three themes were identified: (1) agency; (2) social connections; (3) socioeconomic environment. The interventions were experienced as being positive for mental health when people felt a sense of agency and social connection. The barriers to effectiveness and engagement included socioeconomic deprivation and underfunding of community sector organisations. If non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions for CMDs are to avoid widening health inequalities, key socioeconomic barriers to their accessibility and implementation must be addressed.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthHumansPrimary Health Caremental health inequalitiesprimary carequalitative researchsocial prescribingsocioeconomic disadvantagesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37047854
PMCPMC10094719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.