Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047748›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Machine Learning as a Support for the Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.

Antonio Agliata, Deborah Giordano, Francesco Bardozzo, Salvatore Bottiglieri, Angelo Facchiano, Roberto Tagliaferri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Artificial intelligence in endocrinology: a comprehensive review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio AgliataDipartimento di Scienze Aziendali, Management and Innovation Systems, Università degli Studi di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.
Deborah GiordanoNational Research Council, Institute of Food Science, Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-1913
Francesco BardozzoDipartimento di Scienze Aziendali, Management and Innovation Systems, Università degli Studi di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0199-6623
Salvatore BottiglieriBC Soft, Centro Direzionale, Via Taddeo da Sessa Isola F10, 80143 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-0060-8997
Angelo FacchianoNational Research Council, Institute of Food Science, Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7077-4912
Roberto TagliaferriDipartimento di Scienze Aziendali, Management and Innovation Systems, Università degli Studi di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-9025
University of Salerno · ITInstitute of Food Science · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a chronic, metabolic disease characterized by high blood sugar levels. Among the main types of diabetes, type 2 is the most common. Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent or delay the onset of complications. Previous studies examined the application of machine learning techniques for prediction of the pathology, and here an artificial neural network shows very promising results as a possible valuable aid in the management and prevention of diabetes. Additionally, its superior ability for long-term predictions makes it an ideal choice for this field of study. We utilized machine learning methods to uncover previously undiscovered associations between an individual's health status and the development of type 2 diabetes, with the goal of accurately predicting its onset or determining the individual's risk level. Our study employed a binary classifier, trained on scratch, to identify potential nonlinear relationships between the onset of type 2 diabetes and a set of parameters obtained from patient measurements. Three datasets were utilized, i.e., the National Center for Health Statistics' (NHANES) biennial survey, MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV. These datasets were then combined to create a single dataset with the same number of individuals with and without type 2 diabetes. Since the dataset was balanced, the primary evaluation metric for the model was accuracy. The outcomes of this study were encouraging, with the model achieving accuracy levels of up to 86% and a ROC AUC value of 0.934. Further investigation is needed to improve the reliability of the model by considering multiple measurements from the same patient over time.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerNutrition SurveysReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligenceneural networkT2DM

Identifiers

PMID37047748
PMCPMC10095542
OpenAlexW4362610473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.