Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047543›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Methodologies Used in the Drug Discovery Process with Emphasis on In Vivo Validation.

Nikoletta-Maria Koutroumpa, Konstantinos D Papavasileiou, Anastasios G Papadiamantis, Georgia Melagraki, Antreas Afantitis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikoletta-Maria KoutroumpaDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1070, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-8332-9690
Konstantinos D PapavasileiouDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1070, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-2322-7422
Anastasios G PapadiamantisDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1070, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-1297-3104
Georgia MelagrakiDivision of Physical Sciences & Applications, Hellenic Military Academy, 166 73 Vari, Greece.
Antreas AfantitisDepartment of ChemoInformatics, NovaMechanics Ltd., Nicosia 1070, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-8180

Funding

H2020 954992 (CAPSTONE-ETN)H2020 EthnoHERBS 823973H2020 Scenarios 101037509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery and development of new drugs are extremely long and costly processes. Recent progress in artificial intelligence has made a positive impact on the drug development pipeline. Numerous challenges have been addressed with the growing exploitation of drug-related data and the advancement of deep learning technology. Several model frameworks have been proposed to enhance the performance of deep learning algorithms in molecular design. However, only a few have had an immediate impact on drug development since computational results may not be confirmed experimentally. This systematic review aims to summarize the different deep learning architectures used in the drug discovery process and are validated with further in vivo experiments. For each presented study, the proposed molecule or peptide that has been generated or identified by the deep learning model has been biologically evaluated in animal models. These state-of-the-art studies highlight that even if artificial intelligence in drug discovery is still in its infancy, it has great potential to accelerate the drug discovery cycle, reduce the required costs, and contribute to the integration of the 3R (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) principles. Out of all the reviewed scientific articles, seven algorithms were identified: recurrent neural networks, specifically, long short-term memory (LSTM-RNNs), Autoencoders (AEs) and their Wasserstein Autoencoders (WAEs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) variants; Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs); Direct Message Passing Neural Networks (D-MPNNs); and Multitask Deep Neural Networks (MTDNNs). LSTM-RNNs were the most used architectures with molecules or peptide sequences as inputs.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsDrug DiscoveryNeural Networks, Computeranimal modelartificial intelligencebiological evaluationdeep learningdrug designdrug discoveryin vivomachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37047543
PMCPMC10095548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.