Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37047510›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Potential Use of a Combined Bacteriophage-Probiotic Sanitation System to Control Microbial Contamination and AMR in Healthcare Settings: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.

Maria D'Accolti, Irene Soffritti, Francesca Bini, Eleonora Mazziga, Luca Arnoldo, Antonella Volta, Matteo Bisi, Paola Antonioli, Patrizia Laurenti, Walter Ricciardi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in phage therapy forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria D'AccoltiSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, and LTTA, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1937-5534
Irene SoffrittiSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, and LTTA, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-295X
Francesca BiniSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, and LTTA, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Eleonora MazzigaSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, and LTTA, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Luca ArnoldoDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8068-5219
Antonella VoltaCIAS Research Center, University of Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy.
Matteo BisiCIAS Research Center, University of Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy.
Paola AntonioliDepartment of Infection Prevention Control and Risk Management, S. Anna University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Patrizia LaurentiDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-0593
Walter RicciardiDepartment of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-688X
Sara VincentiDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Sante MazzacaneCIAS Research Center, University of Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy.
Elisabetta CaselliSection of Microbiology, Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, and LTTA, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6048-9141

Funding

NRRP 0001052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial contamination in the hospital environment is a major concern for public health, since it significantly contributes to the onset of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), which are further complicated by the alarming level of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of HAI-associated pathogens. Chemical disinfection to control bioburden has a temporary effect and can favor the selection of resistant pathogens, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, probiotic-based sanitation (probiotic cleaning hygiene system, PCHS) was reported to stably abate pathogens, AMR, and HAIs. PCHS action is not rapid nor specific, being based on competitive exclusion, but the addition of lytic bacteriophages that quickly and specifically kill selected bacteria was shown to improve PCHS effectiveness. This study aimed to investigate the effect of such combined probiotic-phage sanitation (PCHSφ) in two Italian hospitals, targeting staphylococcal contamination. The results showed that PCHSφ could provide a significantly higher removal of staphylococci, including resistant strains, compared with disinfectants (-76%,

Indexed as

BacteriophagesCOVID-19Cross InfectionProbioticsChlorineDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsSanitationStaphylococcusChlorineAMRbacteriophagesbioburdenHAIprobioticssanitation

Identifiers

PMID37047510
PMCPMC10095405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.