ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
A Standardized Protocol for Assuring the Validity of Proteomics Results from Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomics and Metabolomics-Based Investigation of Local Microenvironmental Changes in Sensitized Acupoint Compared to Non-Sensitized Point Among Patients with Chronic Atrophic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study Protocol.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- An Overview of Advancements in Proteomic Approaches to Enhance Livestock Production and Aquaculture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Advanced Imputation Methods for Proteomic Data Acquired via the Label-Free Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Structural Characterization and Electrochemical Studies of Selected Alkaloid N-Oxides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unveiling the power of proteomics in advancing tropical animal health and production.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significant advances in the technological development of mass spectrometry in the field of proteomics and the generation of extremely large amounts of data require a very critical approach to assure the validity of results. Commonly used procedures involved liquid chromatography followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry measurements. Proteomics analysis is used in many fields including the investigation of the metabolism of biologically active substances in organisms. Thus, there is a need to care about the validity of the obtained results. In this work, we proposed a standardized protocol for proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry, which covers all of these analytical steps to ensure the validity of the results. For this purpose, we explored the requirements of the ISO/IEC 17025:2017 standard as a reference document for quality control in biochemistry research-based mass spectrometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.