Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046764›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

p53 and p63 Proteoforms Derived from Alternative Splicing Possess Differential Seroreactivity in Colorectal Cancer with Distinct Diagnostic Ability from the Canonical Proteins.

Ana Montero-Calle, María Garranzo-Asensio, Rebeca M Torrente-Rodríguez, Víctor Ruiz-Valdepeñas Montiel, Carmen Poves, Jana Dziaková, Rodrigo Sanz, Cristina Díaz Del Arco, José Manuel Pingarrón, María Jesús Fernández-Aceñero and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The p53 Isoforms as Potential Biomarkers in Different Cancer Entities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Montero-CalleChronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-0454
María Garranzo-AsensioChronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.
Rebeca M Torrente-RodríguezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28014 Madrid, Spain.
Víctor Ruiz-Valdepeñas MontielDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28014 Madrid, Spain.
Carmen PovesGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Jana DziakováSurgical Digestive Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5317-5275
Rodrigo SanzSurgical Digestive Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Díaz Del ArcoSurgical Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6100-4967
José Manuel PingarrónDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28014 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-1383
María Jesús Fernández-AceñeroSurgical Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2439-3553
Susana CampuzanoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28014 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9928-6613
Rodrigo BarderasChronic Disease Programme (UFIEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3539-7469
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid S2018/NMT-4349Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20CIII/00019Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-103899RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The detection in plasma samples of autoantibodies against specific tumor-associated antigens has been demonstrated to be useful for the early diagnosis of CRC by liquid biopsy. However, new studies related to the humoral immune response in cancer are needed to enable blood-based diagnosis of the disease. Here, our aim was to characterize the humoral immune response associated with the different p53 and p63 proteoforms derived from alternative splicing and previously described as aberrantly expressed in CRC. Thus, here we investigated the diagnostic ability of the twelve p53 proteoforms and the eight p63 proteoforms described to date, and their specific N-terminal and C-terminal end peptides, by means of luminescence HaloTag beads immunoassays. Full-length proteoforms or specific peptides were cloned as HaloTag fusion proteins and their seroreactivity analyzed using plasma from CRC patients at stages I-IV (

Indexed as

alternative splicingautoantibodiesbiosensorcolorectal cancerdiagnosishumoral immune responseimmunomicsp53 and p63p53 familyPOC-like deviceproteoform

Identifiers

PMID37046764
PMCPMC10092954
OpenAlexW4362466717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.