Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046704›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Excitement and Concerns of Young Radiation Oncologists over Automatic Segmentation: A French Perspective.

Vincent Bourbonne, Adrien Laville, Nicolas Wagneur, Youssef Ghannam, Audrey Larnaudie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent BourbonneRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Brest, 2 Avenue Foch, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2631-0029
Adrien LavilleRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Amiens-Picardie, 30 Avenue de la Croix Jourdain, 80054 Amiens, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9292-1744
Nicolas WagneurSociété Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues, 47 Rue de la Colonie, 75013 Paris, France.
Youssef GhannamSociété Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues, 47 Rue de la Colonie, 75013 Paris, France.
Audrey LarnaudieSociété Française des Jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues, 47 Rue de la Colonie, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7043-2103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSegmentation of organs at risk (OARs) and target volumes need time and precision but are highly repetitive tasks. Radiation oncology has known tremendous technological advances in recent years, the latest being brought by artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the advantages brought by AI for segmentation, some concerns were raised by academics regarding the impact on young radiation oncologists' training. A survey was thus conducted on young french radiation oncologists (ROs) by the SFjRO (Société Française des jeunes Radiothérapeutes Oncologues). METHODOLOGY: The SFjRO organizes regular webinars focusing on anatomical localization, discussing either segmentation or dosimetry. Completion of the survey was mandatory for registration to a dosimetry webinar dedicated to head and neck (H & N) cancers. The survey was generated in accordance with the CHERRIES guidelines. Quantitative data (e.g., time savings and correction needs) were not measured but determined among the propositions.

results117 young ROs from 35 different and mostly academic centers participated. Most centers were either already equipped with such solutions or planning to be equipped in the next two years. AI segmentation software was mostly useful for H & N cases. While for the definition of OARs, participants experienced a significant time gain using AI-proposed delineations, with almost 35% of the participants saving between 50-100% of the segmentation time, time gained for target volumes was significantly lower, with only 8.6% experiencing a 50-100% gain. Contours still needed to be thoroughly checked, especially target volumes for some, and edited. The majority of participants suggested that these tools should be integrated into the training so that future radiation oncologists do not neglect the importance of radioanatomy. Fully aware of this risk, up to one-third of them even suggested that AI tools should be reserved for senior physicians only.

conclusionsWe believe this survey on automatic segmentation to be the first to focus on the perception of young radiation oncologists. Software developers should focus on enhancing the quality of proposed segmentations, while young radiation oncologists should become more acquainted with these tools.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomatic segmentationradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID37046704
PMCPMC10093734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.