Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046687›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment.

Lorenzo Bianchi, Francesco Ceci, Eleonora Balestrazzi, Francesco Costa, Matteo Droghetti, Pietro Piazza, Alessandro Pissavini, Massimiliano Presutti, Andrea Farolfi, Riccardo Mei and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. True-PositiveJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  3. [EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  4. Comparison of Digital versus AnalogDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lorenzo BianchiDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-1536
Francesco CeciDivision of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-5248
Eleonora BalestrazziDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Francesco CostaDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-5442
Matteo DroghettiDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-4691
Pietro PiazzaDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-534X
Alessandro PissaviniDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Massimiliano PresuttiDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea FarolfiNuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5443-4301
Riccardo MeiNuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-1891
Paolo CastellucciNuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Alessandro LarcherUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Daniele RobestiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Alexandre MottrieDepartment of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Alessio Giuseppe MorgantiRadiation Oncology Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-3410
Stefano FantiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-2624
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Riccardo SchiavinaDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Eugenio BrunocillaDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients.

methodswe performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments: MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease.

resultsOverall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (

Indexed as

hormone sensitive prostate cancermetastasis-directed therapyoligorecurrent prostate cancerPSMA-PETsurvival

Identifiers

PMID37046687
PMCPMC10093227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.