Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046581›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Hybridization of Deep Learning Pre-Trained Models with Machine Learning Classifiers and Fuzzy Min-Max Neural Network for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis.

Madhura Kalbhor, Swati Shinde, Daniela Elena Popescu, D Jude Hemanth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madhura KalbhorDepartment of Computer Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune 411044, India.
Swati ShindeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune 411044, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-3025
Daniela Elena PopescuFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7804-5178
D Jude HemanthDepartment of ECE, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6091-1880

Funding

Department of Science and Technology TDP/BDTD/29/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image analysis and classification is an important application of computer vision wherein disease prediction based on an input image is provided to assist healthcare professionals. There are many deep learning architectures that accept the different medical image modalities and provide the decisions about the diagnosis of various cancers, including breast cancer, cervical cancer, etc. The Pap-smear test is the commonly used diagnostic procedure for early identification of cervical cancer, but it has a high rate of false-positive results due to human error. Therefore, computer-aided diagnostic systems based on deep learning need to be further researched to classify the pap-smear images accurately. A fuzzy min-max neural network is a neuro fuzzy architecture that has many advantages, such as training with a minimum number of passes, handling overlapping class classification, supporting online training and adaptation, etc. This paper has proposed a novel hybrid technique that combines the deep learning architectures with machine learning classifiers and fuzzy min-max neural network for feature extraction and Pap-smear image classification, respectively. The deep learning pretrained models used are Alexnet, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, and GoogleNet. Benchmark datasets used for the experimentation are Herlev and Sipakmed. The highest classification accuracy of 95.33% is obtained using Resnet-50 fine-tuned architecture followed by Alexnet on Sipakmed dataset. In addition to the improved accuracies, the proposed model has utilized the advantages of fuzzy min-max neural network classifiers mentioned in the literature.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkscytology image classificationfuzzy min–max neural network (FMMN)machine learningpre-trained modelstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37046581
PMCPMC10093705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.