Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046574›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Extravascular Ultrasound (EVUS) to Assess the Results of Peripheral Endovascular Procedures.

Stefano Fazzini, Federico Francisco Pennetta, Valerio Turriziani, Simona Vona, Andrea Ascoli Marchetti, Arnaldo Ippoliti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intravascular Iliac Artery Lithotripsy to Facilitate Aortic Endograft Delivery: Midterm Results of a Dual-Center Experience.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano FazziniVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-4947
Federico Francisco PennettaVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2477-6562
Valerio TurrizianiVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-5777
Simona VonaVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.
Andrea Ascoli MarchettiVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9229-0495
Arnaldo IppolitiVascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Cracovia, 50, 00133 Roma, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast arteriography (CA) is considered the gold standard to evaluate any phase in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) interventions, from diagnostics to final results. Nevertheless, duplex ultrasonography (DUS) mostly used for the pre/postoperative phase and follow-up control, could be a potential intraoperative adjunctive imaging tool to assess the effects of endovascular revascularization in patients with iliac and femoropopliteal lesions. The PAD "duplex-assisted" protocol includes a preoperative DUS control followed by an intraoperative and a postoperative control. The most important parameters are pulsed doppler spectral analysis and waveform changes, which are impossible to detect with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). By using a similar acronym, the intraoperative DUS has been previously described as extravascular ultrasound (EVUS). B-mode imaging, color flow, and peak systolic velocity (PSV) are considered. EVUS could be very useful to evaluate the effects of endovascular treatment, mainly in cases of unclear CAs, severe calcifications and/or dissections. In the context of the "leaving nothing behind" strategy, EVUS can drive the physician to evaluate the absence of flow-limiting dissections and decide which target lesion should be treated with antirestenotic therapy, further vessel preparation, or stenting. The EVUS protocol could be a safe and feasible option to improve the completion assessment of endovascular PAD treatment. A better ultrasound waveform is a sign of improved luminal gain and compliance, which is extremely important to finalize the results of new peripheral device technology, such as intravascular lithotripsy.

Indexed as

angiographyduplex ultrasoundEVUSlithotripsyPAD

Identifiers

PMID37046574
PMCPMC10093749
OpenAlexW4362671529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.