Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046542›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Chest CT Angiograms.

Philippe A Grenier, Angela Ayobi, Sarah Quenet, Maxime Tassy, Michael Marx, Daniel S Chow, Brent D Weinberg, Peter D Chang, Yasmina Chaibi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. New Diagnostic Tools for Pulmonary Embolism Detection.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe A GrenierDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Foch Hospital Suresnes, Versailles Saint Quentin University, 78000 Versailles, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-0032
Angela AyobiAvicenna.AI, 13600 La Ciotat, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-6782
Sarah QuenetAvicenna.AI, 13600 La Ciotat, France.ORCID 0009-0005-7192-1442
Maxime TassyAvicenna.AI, 13600 La Ciotat, France.ORCID 0009-0008-7755-7356
Michael MarxAvicenna.AI, 13600 La Ciotat, France.
Daniel S ChowDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Brent D WeinbergDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-1747
Peter D ChangDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Yasmina ChaibiAvicenna.AI, 13600 La Ciotat, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-172X
University of California, Irvine · USEmory University · USUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince the prompt recognition of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the immediate initiation of treatment can significantly reduce the risk of death, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based application aimed to automatically detect PEs on chest computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) and alert radiologists for an urgent interpretation. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used to design the application. The associated algorithm used a hybrid 3D/2D UNet topology. The training phase was performed on datasets adequately distributed in terms of vendors, patient age, slice thickness, and kVp. The objective of this study was to validate the performance of the algorithm in detecting suspected PEs on CTAs.

methodsThe validation dataset included 387 anonymized real-world chest CTAs from multiple clinical sites (228 U.S. cities). The data were acquired on 41 different scanner models from five different scanner makers. The ground truth (presence or absence of PE on CTA images) was established by three independent U.S. board-certified radiologists.

resultsThe algorithm correctly identified 170 of 186 exams positive for PE (sensitivity 91.4% [95% CI: 86.4-95.0%]) and 184 of 201 exams negative for PE (specificity 91.5% [95% CI: 86.8-95.0%]), leading to an accuracy of 91.5%. False negative cases were either chronic PEs or PEs at the limit of subsegmental arteries and close to partial volume effect artifacts. Most of the false positive findings were due to contrast agent-related fluid artifacts, pulmonary veins, and lymph nodes.

conclusionsThe DL-based algorithm has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity for the detection of PE on CTAs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechest CTcomputed tomography angiographydeep learning toolpulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID37046542
PMCPMC10093638
OpenAlexW4362577737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.