Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046538›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Weighted Average Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Stratification of Brain Tumor in MRI Images.

Vatsala Anand, Sheifali Gupta, Deepali Gupta, Yonis Gulzar, Qin Xin, Sapna Juneja, Asadullah Shah, Asadullah Shaikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vatsala AnandChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India.
Sheifali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5692-418X
Deepali GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-5248
Yonis GulzarDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6515-1569
Qin XinFaculty of Science and Technology, University of the Faroe Islands, Vestarabryggja 15, FO 100 Torshavn, Faroe Islands, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-8538
Sapna JunejaKulliyyah of Information and Communication Technology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak 53100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0009-3410-3087
Asadullah ShahKulliyyah of Information and Communication Technology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Gombak 53100, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-328X
Asadullah ShaikhDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Science and Information Systems, Najran University, Najran 55461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-6159

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University GRANT2,792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor diagnosis at an early stage can improve the chances of successful treatment and better patient outcomes. In the biomedical industry, non-invasive diagnostic procedures, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to diagnose brain tumors. Deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence, can analyze MRI images in a matter of seconds, reducing the time it takes for diagnosis and potentially improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, an ensemble model can help increase the accuracy of classification by combining the strengths of multiple models and compensating for their individual weaknesses. Therefore, in this research, a weighted average ensemble deep learning model is proposed for the classification of brain tumors. For the weighted ensemble classification model, three different feature spaces are taken from the transfer learning VGG19 model, Convolution Neural Network (CNN) model without augmentation, and CNN model with augmentation. These three feature spaces are ensembled with the best combination of weights, i.e., weight1, weight2, and weight3 by using grid search. The dataset used for simulation is taken from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), having a lower-grade glioma collection with 3929 MRI images of 110 patients. The ensemble model helps reduce overfitting by combining multiple models that have learned different aspects of the data. The proposed ensemble model outperforms the three individual models for detecting brain tumors in terms of accuracy, precision, and F1-score. Therefore, the proposed model can act as a second opinion tool for radiologists to diagnose the tumor from MRI images of the brain.

Indexed as

biomedicalbrain tumorConvolution Neural Network (CNN)data augmentationensembledweighted average

Identifiers

PMID37046538
PMCPMC10093740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.