ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Automatic Classification of Particles in the Urine Sediment Test with the Developed Artificial Intelligence-Based Hybrid Model.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tribulations, Triumphs, and Governance: Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.EJIFCC · 2025Article
- A multi-head YOLOv12 with self-supervised pretraining for urinary sediment particle detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Are we ready to integrate advanced artificial intelligence models in clinical laboratory?Biochemia medica · 2025Review
- Urinary renal tubular epithelial cells and casts as predictors of renal outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy.Journal of nephrology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Review
- Multi-feature fusion and dandelion optimizer based model for automatically diagnosing the gastrointestinal diseases.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urine sediment examination is one of the main tests used in the diagnosis of many diseases. Thanks to this test, many diseases can be detected in advance. Examining the results of this test is an intensive and time-consuming process. Therefore, it is very important to automatically interpret the urine sediment test results using computer-aided systems. In this study, a data set consisting of eight classes was used. The data set used in the study consists of 8509 particle images obtained by examining the particles in the urine sediment. A hybrid model based on textural and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) was developed to classify the images in the related data set. The features obtained using textural-based methods and the features obtained from CNN-based architectures were combined after optimizing using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) method. In this way, we aimed to extract different features of the same image. This increased the performance of the proposed model. The CNN-based ResNet50 architecture and textural-based Local Binary Pattern (LBP) method were used for feature extraction. Finally, the optimized and combined feature map was classified at different machine learning classifiers. In order to compare the performance of the model proposed in the study, results were also obtained from different CNN architectures. A high accuracy value of 96.0% was obtained in the proposed model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.