Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046478›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Beyond Henssge's Formula: Using Regression Trees and a Support Vector Machine for Time of Death Estimation in Forensic Medicine.

Lívia Mária Dani, Dénes Tóth, Andrew B Frigyik, Zsolt Kozma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lívia Mária DaniDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Szigeti út 12, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0005-6459-5677
Dénes TóthDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Szigeti út 12, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9074-3478
Andrew B FrigyikBánki Donát Faculty of Mechanical and Safety Engineering, Óbuda University, Népszínház u. 8, H-1081 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4220-4680
Zsolt KozmaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Szigeti út 12, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Henssge's nomogram is a commonly used method to estimate the time of death. However, uncertainties arising from the graphical solution of the original mathematical formula affect the accuracy of the resulting time interval. Using existing machine learning techniques/tools such as support vector machines (SVMs) and decision trees, we present a more accurate and adaptive method for estimating the time of death compared to Henssge's nomogram. Using the Python programming language, we built a synthetic data-driven model in which the majority of the selected tools can estimate the time of death with low error rates even despite having only 3000 training cases. An SVM with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel and AdaBoost+SVR provided the best results in estimating the time of death with the lowest error with an estimated time of death accuracy of approximately ±20 min or ±9.6 min, respectively, depending on the SVM parameters. The error in the predicted time (tp[h]) was tp±0.7 h with a 94.45% confidence interval. Because training requires only a small quantity of data, our model can be easily customized to specific populations with varied anthropometric parameters or living in different climatic zones. The errors produced by the proposed method are a magnitude smaller than any previous result.

Indexed as

forensic pathologymachine learningmultidisciplinary approachpost mortem intervalsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID37046478
PMCPMC10093024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.