Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046459›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Liquid Biopsy in the Management of Breast Cancer Patients: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going.

Carlotta Mazzitelli, Donatella Santini, Angelo Gianluca Corradini, Claudio Zamagni, Davide Trerè, Lorenzo Montanaro, Mario Taffurelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Next-generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel in advanced solid tumors: five years of experience from an Italian referral institution.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Harmonization trial onThe journal of liquid biopsy · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlotta MazzitelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-4309
Donatella SantiniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1692-6348
Angelo Gianluca CorradiniUnit of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Claudio ZamagniUnit of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Davide TrerèDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1127-1052
Lorenzo MontanaroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-9518
Mario TaffurelliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy (LB) is an emerging diagnostic tool that analyzes biomarkers in the blood (and possibly in other body fluids) to provide information about tumor genetics and response to therapy. This review article provides an overview of LB applications in human cancer with a focus on breast cancer patients. LB methods include circulating tumor cells and cell-free tumor products, such as circulating tumor DNA. LB has shown potential in detecting cancer at an early stage, monitoring tumor progression and recurrence, and predicting patient response to therapy. Several studies have demonstrated its clinical utility in breast cancer patients. However, there are limitations to LB, including the lack of standardized assays and the need for further validation. Future potential applications of LB include identifying the minimal residual disease, early detection of recurrence, and monitoring treatment response in various cancer types. LB represents a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool with potential applications in breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management. Further research is necessary to fully understand its clinical utility and overcome its current limitations.

Indexed as

breast cancercirculating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAclinical managementliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37046459
PMCPMC10092978
OpenAlexW4361010293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.