ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
BC
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- BC-SwinNet: Swin transformer and CNN with multi-objective optimization for multi-class breast cancer detection using Histopathological images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DermaCalibra: A Robust and Explainable Multimodal Framework for Skin Lesion Diagnosis via Bayesian Uncertainty and Dynamic Modulation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Breast cancer inter-image dissimilarity by feature optimization: An application of novel flea optimization algorithm.PloS one · 2026Article
- Big Data Analytics Framework for Early Breast Cancer Detection Using Optimized MapReduce and Deep Learning on Large-Scale Mammographic Data.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Histopathological image based breast cancer diagnosis using deep learning and bio inspired optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GBCHV an advanced deep learning anatomy aware model for accurate classification of gallbladder cancer utilizing ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applying YOLOv6 as an ensemble federated learning framework to classify breast cancer pathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An improved breast cancer classification with hybrid chaotic sand cat and Remora Optimization feature selection algorithm.PloS one · 2024Article
- A novel fusion framework of deep bottleneck residual convolutional neural network for breast cancer classification from mammogram images.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Enhancing accessibility for improved diagnosis with modified EfficientNetV2-S and cyclic learning rate strategy in women with disabilities and breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Classification of skin cancer stages using a AHP fuzzy technique within the context of big data healthcare.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Multi-classification deep neural networks for identification of fish species using camera captured images.PloS one · 2023Article
- Enhancing breast ultrasound segmentation through fine-tuning and optimization techniques: Sharp attention UNet.PloS one · 2023Article
- A novel framework of multiclass skin lesion recognition from dermoscopic images using deep learning and explainable AI.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most frequent cancers in women is breast cancer, and in the year 2022, approximately 287,850 new cases have been diagnosed. From them, 43,250 women died from this cancer. An early diagnosis of this cancer can help to overcome the mortality rate. However, the manual diagnosis of this cancer using mammogram images is not an easy process and always requires an expert person. Several AI-based techniques have been suggested in the literature. However, still, they are facing several challenges, such as similarities between cancer and non-cancer regions, irrelevant feature extraction, and weak training models. In this work, we proposed a new automated computerized framework for breast cancer classification. The proposed framework improves the contrast using a novel enhancement technique called haze-reduced local-global. The enhanced images are later employed for the dataset augmentation. This step aimed at increasing the diversity of the dataset and improving the training capability of the selected deep learning model. After that, a pre-trained model named EfficientNet-b0 was employed and fine-tuned to add a few new layers. The fine-tuned model was trained separately on original and enhanced images using deep transfer learning concepts with static hyperparameters' initialization. Deep features were extracted from the average pooling layer in the next step and fused using a new serial-based approach. The fused features were later optimized using a feature selection algorithm known as Equilibrium-Jaya controlled Regula Falsi. The Regula Falsi was employed as a termination function in this algorithm. The selected features were finally classified using several machine learning classifiers. The experimental process was conducted on two publicly available datasets-CBIS-DDSM and INbreast. For these datasets, the achieved average accuracy is 95.4% and 99.7%. A comparison with state-of-the-art (SOTA) technology shows that the obtained proposed framework improved the accuracy. Moreover, the confidence interval-based analysis shows consistent results of the proposed framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.