Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046335›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2023

Use of disease assessment tools to increase the value of case reports on Susac syndrome: two case reports.

Danielle R Bullock, Robert T Spencer, Richard K Vehe, Sunil Srivastava, Robert M Rennebohm

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A 14-Year-Old Male With Susac Syndrome: A Case Report.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle R BullockDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, East Bldg Rm M668, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Robert T SpencerColorado Arthritis Center, Rheumatology, 401 E Hampden Ave, Suite 410, Englewood, CO, 80113, USA.
Richard K VeheDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, East Bldg Rm M668, 2450 Riverside Ave, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Sunil SrivastavaOphthalmology Department, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 2022 E 105th St, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Robert M RennebohmDivision of Pediatric Rheumatology, Institute of Pediatrics, Formerly at the Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. rmrennebohm@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSusac syndrome is an immune-mediated, ischemia-producing, occlusive microvascular endotheliopathy that threatens the brain, retina, and inner ear. There is a need for disease assessment tools that can help clinicians and patients to more easily, accurately, and uniformly track the clinical course and outcome of Susac syndrome. Ideally, such tools should simultaneously facilitate the clinical care and study of Susac syndrome and improve the value of future case reports. To meet this need, two novel clinical assessment tools were developed: the Susac Symptoms Form and the Susac Disease Damage Score. The former is a comprehensive self-report form that is completed by patients/families to serially document the clinical status of a patient. The latter documents the extent of damage perceived by individual patients/families and their physicians. Both forms were initially trialed with two particularly representative and instructive patients. The results of this trial are shared in this report. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient 1 is a 21-year-old Caucasian female who presented with an acute onset of headache, paresthesias, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional lability. Patient 2 is a 14-year-old Caucasian female who presented with an acute onset of headache, cognitive dysfunction, urinary incontinence, ataxia, and personality change. Both patients fulfilled criteria for a definite diagnosis of Susac syndrome: both eventually developed brain, retinal, and inner ear involvement, and both had typical "snowball lesions" on magnetic resonance imaging. The Susac Symptoms Form documented initial improvement in both patients, was sufficiently sensitive in detecting a subsequent relapse in the second patient, and succinctly documented the long-term clinical course in both patients. The Disease Damage Score documented minimal disease damage in the first patient and more significant damage in the second.

conclusionsThe Susac Symptoms Form and the Disease Damage Score are useful disease assessment tools, both for clinical care and research purposes. Their use could enhance the value of future case reports on Susac syndrome and could improve opportunities to learn from a series of such reports.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionSusac SyndromeAdolescentAdultBrainDisease ProgressionFemaleHeadacheHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingYoung AdultCase reportClinical courseDisease assessment toolsOutcomeSusac syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37046335
PMCPMC10097450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.