Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046287›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2023

Potentialities and limitations of Interprofessional Education during graduation: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Jéssica Rodrigues da Silva Noll Gonçalves, Rodrigo Noll Gonçalves, Saulo Vinicius da Rosa, Juliana Schaia Rocha Orsi, Karoline Maria Santos de Paula, Samuel Jorge Moysés, Renata Iani Werneck

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jéssica Rodrigues da Silva Noll GonçalvesSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. jessicarodriguesdasilva@yahoo.com.br.
Rodrigo Noll GonçalvesPostgraduate Programme in Public Policy at the Federal University of Paraná, No. 632, Prefeito Lothário Meissner Avenue, Curitiba, Paraná, 80210-170, Brazil.
Saulo Vinicius da RosaSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Juliana Schaia Rocha OrsiSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Karoline Maria Santos de PaulaSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Samuel Jorge MoysésSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Renata Iani WerneckSchool of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, No. 1155, Imaculada Conceição Street, 80215-901, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

This study was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil (finance code 001) 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid demographic, epidemiological, technological, cultural/behavioural, and educational transitions, as they become more complex, demand new integrated and complementary professional skills and abilities. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is a promising alternative to deal with these changes, especially in courses in the health area. This systematic review was to explore the potentialities and limitations of IPE, from the perspective of undergraduate students, through a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

methodsA thematic synthesis of qualitative studies was conducted. The question elaborated for this review was: "What is the impact of interprofessional education on the teaching and learning of students in the health area inserted in Higher Education Institutions?". The search strategy was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Cochrane Library, and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). In addition, searches were carried out in grey literature on the ERIC platforms, ProQuest Disserts and Theses, and Academic Google. The assessment of the quality of the studies was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Data were summarized through thematic synthesis. From the databases, 8,793 studies were identified. After standardized filters procedures, critical summaries, and assessment of relevance to the eligibility criteria, 14 articles were included.

resultsThe synthesis of the studies revealed the potential of this teaching approach, arranged in three analytical themes: learning from each other and about them; the value of education and interprofessional practice; patient-centred health care. On the other hand, some limitations were also identified, such as barriers related to EIP; the difficulties related to teaching methodologies.

conclusionOvercoming the identified limitations can enhance the results of the IPE, in view of its impact on the education of students and on the health care of the population.

Indexed as

Interprofessional EducationStudentsDelivery of Health CareEducational StatusHumansInterprofessional RelationsQualitative ResearchEducationInterdisciplinary communicationInterprofessional educationProfessionalStudents

Identifiers

PMID37046287
PMCPMC10099638
OpenAlexW4365150353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.