Trial reportBMC medical education2023
Examining the effects of student-centered flipped classroom in physiology education.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of the flipped classroom in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Validating the effectiveness of a classroom-setting form of early clinical exposure with direct physician involvement in gastrointestinal physiology education.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Applying Bloom's Taxonomy to Student Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom Model.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- The Efficacy of Integrating Problem-Based Learning with the BOPPPS Six-Step Methodology in Endocrinology Clinical Instruction.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of flipped classroom on learning and satisfaction of nursing students in physiology laboratory education: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Construction of research feedback experimental teaching mode for medical undergraduate students and comparative study with traditional experimental teaching mode.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- The application of multidisciplinary team combined flipped classroom teaching model in oral general course for clinical undergraduates.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- SPOC (Small Private Online Course)-infused flipped classroom: a promising approach to address knowledge lag and practice gaps in infectious diseases teaching.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The positive impact of introducing public engagement as a self-directed learning strategy in undergraduate nervous system education.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Study preferences and exam outcomes in medical education: insights from renal physiology.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Flipping Veterinary Biochemistry, Anatomy, and Physiology: Students' Engagement and Perception.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Hybrid teaching after COVID-19: advantages, challenges and optimization strategies.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe flipped classroom approach has gained increasing popularity in medical education. Physiology is a basic medical course that studies the phenomena and laws of human life activities, and is a crucial link course connecting preclinical courses and clinical courses. However, there is a paucity of data showing the effectiveness of the flipped classroom model for the entirety of physiology course in medical undergraduate students.
method131 sophomore students with clinical medicine major at Harbin Medical University were recruited and they were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group which was subjected to traditional lecture teaching (n = 69), and the experimental group which was subjected to flipped classroom teaching (n = 62). To assess the effect of flipped teaching, the usual performance and final exam scores were used to evaluate the physiology learning effectiveness of students. The correlation between the usual performance and final exam scores by Pearson method was also conducted in the two teaching groups. After course completion, an anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among the subjects of flipped classroom group to assess students' opinion regarding the flipped classroom teaching.
resultsOur results showed that the usual performance and final exam scores of students in the flipped classroom were both significantly higher than that in the traditional teaching class (P < 0.05). Moreover, our results also showed that the usual performance of students was significantly correlated with the final exam scores in the flipped classroom (r = 0.3945, P < 0.01), but not in the traditional teaching group (r = 0.1522, P = 0.2119). The results of questionnaire survey showed that 77.58% of the students believed flipped classroom teaching improved their knowledge acquisition. 70%~86% of students perceived that flipped classroom enhanced their learning abilities, including self-study ability, collaborative learning and problem-solving skills, and clinical thinking ability. In addition, about 60% of students acknowledged the teaching design and teaching environment, more students' engagement and presentation of group learning in the flipped classroom.
conclusionThe flipped classroom teaching significantly improved students' learning effectiveness in physiology course, as indicated by final exam score and usual performance. It also promoted higher-order ability-set acquisition and allowed a rationalized formative evaluation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.