ArticleBMC surgery2023
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary abdominopelvic aggressive angiomyxoma: a retrospective review of 12 consecutive cases from a sarcoma referral center.
Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vulvar Aggressive Angiomyxoma in a Postmenopausal Woman: Diagnostic Pitfalls and Surgical Implications-A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Aggressive clitoral angiomyxoma mimicking bartholinits: A case report and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Angiomyxoma coexisting with focal nodular hyperplasia: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAggressive angiomyxoma (AAM) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that mostly arises from the pelvic and perineal soft tissues. Few studies reported its characteristics and outcomes previously due to its rarity and challenges of treatments. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics as well as surgical and short-term survival outcomes of primary abdominopelvic AAM.
methodsMedical records of patients who were admitted to surgery with pathological confirmation of primary abdominopelvic AAM at Peking University International Hospital from January 2016 through December 2021 were retrospectively retrieved from our retroperitoneal tumor database. Demographics, operative outcomes and pathological findings were collected. Patients received followed-up routinely after the surgery. Survival probabilities were calculated and determined through Kaplan-Meier analysis.
resultsA total of 12 consecutive patients (male/female 4:8) were included in this study. The median age was 45 years old. The clinical presentation varied among individuals, consisting of 2 abdominal discomforts, 4 constipations, 1 lumbago, 1 prolonged menstruation, and 1 buttock swelling. R0/R1 resection was achieved in 100% of patients. Postoperatively, 50% of patients developed various complications including 3 fistulas and 3 wound infections. No operative mortality was observed. Histopathology of all patients was suggestive of AAM. Immunohistochemistry was done with a 91.7% positive rate for estrogen and progesterone receptors. The median recurrence-free survival time was 38 months. There were no cases of deceased or presented with distal metastasis during a median of 42 months' follow-up.
conclusionsThe clinical manifestations of abdominopelvic AAM are mostly atypical. Surgical resection with curative intents remains the mainstay treatment of this disease, which was strongly suggested in experienced sarcoma centers due to the high probability of severe postoperative complications. In addition, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the high rate of local recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.