Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046248›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2023

Engineering osmolysis susceptibility in Cupriavidus necator and Escherichia coli for recovery of intracellular products.

Jeremy David Adams, Kyle B Sander, Craig S Criddle, Adam P Arkin, Douglas S Clark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Isolation and characterization of aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy David AdamsDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Kyle B SanderDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Craig S CriddleDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Adam P ArkinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Douglas S ClarkDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. dsc@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USStanford University · US

Funding

NASA NNX17AJ31G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracellular biomacromolecules, such as industrial enzymes and biopolymers, represent an important class of bio-derived products obtained from bacterial hosts. A common key step in the downstream separation of these biomolecules is lysis of the bacterial cell wall to effect release of cytoplasmic contents. Cell lysis is typically achieved either through mechanical disruption or reagent-based methods, which introduce issues of energy demand, material needs, high costs, and scaling problems. Osmolysis, a cell lysis method that relies on hypoosmotic downshock upon resuspension of cells in distilled water, has been applied for bioseparation of intracellular products from extreme halophiles and mammalian cells. However, most industrial bacterial strains are non-halotolerant and relatively resistant to hypoosmotic cell lysis.

resultsTo overcome this limitation, we developed two strategies to increase the susceptibility of non-halotolerant hosts to osmolysis using Cupriavidus necator, a strain often used in electromicrobial production, as a prototypical strain. In one strategy, C. necator was evolved to increase its halotolerance from 1.5% to 3.25% (w/v) NaCl through adaptive laboratory evolution, and genes potentially responsible for this phenotypic change were identified by whole genome sequencing. The evolved halotolerant strain experienced an osmolytic efficiency of 47% in distilled water following growth in 3% (w/v) NaCl. In a second strategy, the cells were made susceptible to osmolysis by knocking out the large-conductance mechanosensitive channel (mscL) gene in C. necator. When these strategies were combined by knocking out the mscL gene from the evolved halotolerant strain, greater than 90% osmolytic efficiency was observed upon osmotic downshock. A modified version of this strategy was applied to E. coli BL21 by deleting the mscL and mscS (small-conductance mechanosensitive channel) genes. When grown in medium with 4% NaCl and subsequently resuspended in distilled water, this engineered strain experienced 75% cell lysis, although decreases in cell growth rate due to higher salt concentrations were observed.

conclusionsOur strategy is shown to be a simple and effective way to lyse cells for the purification of intracellular biomacromolecules and may be applicable in many bacteria used for bioproduction.

Indexed as

Cupriavidus necatorEscherichia coli ProteinsAnimalsBacteriaEscherichia coliIon ChannelsMammalsSodium ChlorideWaterEscherichia coli ProteinsIon ChannelsMscL protein, E coliSodium ChlorideWaterAdaptive laboratory evolutionBacteria cell lysisBioseparationsMechanosensitive channelOsmolysis

Identifiers

PMID37046248
PMCPMC10091555
OpenAlexW4365150147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.