Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046246›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Complications and prognosis of primary thoracic and lumbar giant cell tumors treated by total tumor resection.

Jiacheng Liu, Panpan Hu, Hua Zhou, Ben Wang, Xiaoguang Liu, Fengliang Wu, Yan Li, Xiao Liu, Lei Dang, Yanchao Tang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical pathological characteristics correlation ofTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiacheng LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Panpan HuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hua ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ben WangDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiaoguang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Fengliang WuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Lei DangDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yanchao TangDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zihe LiDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhongjun LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Feng WeiDepartment of Orthopedics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. weifeng@bjmu.edu.cn.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal giant cell tumor (SGCT) is a relatively rare primary tumor. En bloc resection is the preferred surgical procedure for it due to its aggressiveness, meanwhile leading to more complications. We reported the characteristics of perioperative complications and local control of total tumor resection including en bloc resection and piecemeal resection for primary thoracic and lumbar spinal giant cell tumors in a single center over 10 years.

methodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional and cohort study. Forty-one consecutive patients with SGCTs who underwent total tumor resection from 2010 to 2020 at our institution and were followed up for at least 24 months were reviewed. Surgery data, complication characteristics and local tumor control were collected and compared by different surgical procedure.

resultsForty-one patients were included, consisting of 18 males and 23 females, with a mean age of 34.2 years. Thirty-one had thoracic vertebra lesions, and 10 had lumbar vertebra lesions. Thirty-five patients were primary cases, and 6 patients were recurrent cases. Eighteen patients were treated by total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), 12 patients underwent en bloc resection according to WBB surgical system, and 11 patients underwent piecemeal resection. The average surgical time was 498 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 2145 ml. A total of 58 complications were recorded, and 30 patients (73.2%) had at least one perioperative complication. All patients were followed up after surgery for at least 2 years. A total of 6 cases had postoperative internal fixation failure, and 4 cases presented local tumor recurrence (9.8%).

conclusionsAlthough the surgical technique is difficult and accompanied by a high rate of perioperative complications, en bloc resection can achieve favorable local control in SGCT. When it is too difficult to complete en bloc resection, thoroughly piecemeal resection without residual is also acceptable, given the relatively low recurrence rate.

Indexed as

Giant Cell TumorsSpinal NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationEn bloc resectionRecurrenceSpinal giant cell tumor

Identifiers

PMID37046246
PMCPMC10091566
OpenAlexW4365148987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.