Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37046152›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Which congestion presentation pattern on the physical findings is associated with future adverse events? A cluster analysis in the multicenter acute heart failure registry.

Nozomi Niimi, Shun Kohsaka, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Makoto Takei, Takashi Kohno, Shintaro Nakano, Yuji Nagatomo, Munehisa Sakamoto, Mike Saji, Nobuhiro Ikemura and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of eplerenone in acute heart failure using a win ratio approach.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nozomi NiimiDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. sk@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-2972
Yasuyuki ShiraishiDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto TakeiDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KohnoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Shintaro NakanoDepartment of Cardiology, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Yuji NagatomoDepartment of Cardiology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Munehisa SakamotoDepartment of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Mike SajiDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhiro IkemuraDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku InoharaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ikuko UedaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi FukudaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsutomu YoshikawaDepartment of Cardiology, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPSakakibara Hospital · JPKyorin University Hospital · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPSaiseikai Central Hospital · JPSaitama Medical University · JPTokyo Medical Center · JP

Funding

Grant from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 201439013CGrant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 17K09526Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 20H03915Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 23591062Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 26461088Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists 18K15860the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2012the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2013the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2014the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2015the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2016the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2017the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2018the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2019the Sakakibara Clinical Research Grant for Promotion of Sciences 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical congestion is the most frequent reason for hospital admission in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). However, few studies have investigated the patterns and prognostic implication of the physical congestion using unbiased and robust statistical methods.

methodsA hierarchical agglomerative clustering analysis was performed in the multicenter Japanese AHF registry (N = 3151) with the distance calculated by Jaccard's distance for jugular vein distention (JVD), leg edema, S3, crackles, and orthopnea. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death and heart failure readmission within 1-year.

resultsAt the time of admission, the median number of prevalent congestive signs was 2. We identified three phenogroups: 'no physical congestions' (N = 251); 'congestion without JVD' (N = 1415); and 'congestion with JVD' (N = 1495). Patients in 'no physical congestion' were the youngest (median 75 [62, 83] years) with the lowest systolic blood pressure (122 [106, 142] mmHg). Patients in 'congestion without JVD', and 'congestion with JVD' were similar in terms of age (77 [67, 84] vs. 78 [69, 84] years) and systolic blood pressure (138 [118, 160] vs. 137 [118, 158] mmHg). While 30-day mortality was similar (4.0%, 3.7%, and 4.3% in 'no physical congestion,' 'congestion without JVD,' and 'congestion with JVD', respectively), the patients in 'congestion with JVD' were at the highest risk for the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.55 when 'no physical congestion' was a reference).

conclusionsOur clustering analysis demonstrated that congestion signs, particularly JVD, allowed identification of AHF phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAcute DiseaseCluster AnalysisEdemaHospitalizationHumansPrognosisRegistriesAcute heart failureCluster analysisCongestionJugular vein distention

Identifiers

PMID37046152
OpenAlexW4365140023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.