ArticleScientific reports2023
Location-based collective distress using large-scale biosignals in real life for walkable built environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Stress Location During Low-Speed Mobility Travel Using Environmental Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The One Health approach in urban ecosystem rehabilitation: An evidence-based framework for designing sustainable cities.iScience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biosignals from wearable sensors have shown great potential for capturing environmental distress that pedestrians experience from negative stimuli (e.g., abandoned houses, poorly maintained sidewalks, graffiti, and so forth). This physiological monitoring approach in an ambulatory setting can mitigate the subjectivity and reliability concerns of traditional self-reported surveys and field audits. However, to date, most prior work has been conducted in a controlled setting and there has been little investigation into utilizing biosignals captured in real-life settings. This research examines the usability of biosignals (electrodermal activity, gait patterns, and heart rate) acquired from real-life settings to capture the environmental distress experienced by pedestrians. We collected and analyzed geocoded biosignals and self-reported stimuli information in real-life settings. Data was analyzed using spatial methods with statistical and machine learning models. Results show that the machine learning algorithm predicted location-based collective distress of pedestrians with 80% accuracy, showing statistical associations between biosignals and the self-reported stimuli. This method is expected to advance our ability to sense and react to not only built environmental issues but also urban dynamics and emergent events, which together will open valuable new opportunities to integrate human biological and physiological data streams into future built environments and/or walkability assessment applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.